0

RECTOVESICAL FISTULA - Report of an unusual case

CASE REPORT :

The following is a case of Imperforate anus for which he was operated. The patient came at 20 yrs of age with complains of decreased micturition and defecation.He was referred for IVP and RGU.
Upon IVP evaluation mild hydronephrosis was noted on both sides probably due to decreased micturition.
Also a radioopaque density was noted in the bladder area...Upon detailed history, the patient gave history of ingesting a coin in childhood which was seen in the bladder region. A small outpouching was also noted in the lower part of the bladder.

IVP Images : 

 

RGU : 
Upon RGU evaluation, the coin was confirmed to be in the rectum. It must've been impacted with fibrosis around it as the coin was ingested in childhood. Also the posterior urethra showed stricture formation with visualization of a rectovesical fistula.



Finally, the patient was referred to surgery department for closure of the fistula and treatment of the posterior urethral stricture.


DISCUSSION : 

Introduction

Normally, the urinary system is completely separated from the alimentary canal. Connections may result from (1) incomplete separation of the two systems during embryonic development (eg, failure of the urorectal septum to divide the common cloaca), (2) infection, (3) inflammatory conditions, (4) cancer, (5) trauma or foreign body, or (6) iatrogenic causes (presenting either postoperatively or as a treatment complication). In the general practice of medicine, bowel disease that occurs adjacent to the bladder and erupts into it is the most common cause of misconnection of the two systems. Fistulae from the bowel to the ureter and the renal pelvis are also possible but uncommon in the absence of trauma, chronic infection, or surgical interventions. This article focuses on the more common causes, presentations, and treatments of enterovesical fistulae.

Presentation

The presenting symptoms and signs of enterovesical fistulae occur primarily in the urinary tract. Symptoms include suprapubic pain, irritative voiding symptoms, and symptoms associated with chronic urinary tract infection (UTI). The hallmark of enterovesical fistulae may be described as Gouverneur syndrome, namely, suprapubic pain, frequency, dysuria, and tenesmus. Other signs include abnormal urinalysis findings, malodorous urine, pneumaturia, debris in the urine, hematuria, and UTIs

Imaging Studies

CT scanning
CT scanning of the abdomen and pelvis is the most sensitive imaging test for detecting a colovesical fistula, and CT scanning should be included as part of the initial evaluation of suspected colovesical fistulae. CT scanning can demonstrate small amounts of air or contrast material in the bladder, localized thickening of the bladder wall, or an extraluminal gas-containing mass adjacent to the bladder. Three-dimensional reconstruction is useful when traditional axial and coronal images fail to demonstrate the anatomy in sufficient detail.The images below show a series of CT scans.

Barium enema
Barium enema (BE) imaging is unreliable in revealing a fistula but is useful in differentiating diverticular disease from cancer. BE imaging can demonstrate the nature and extent of colonic disease. In a 1988 series, Woods et al used BE imaging to demonstrate fistulae in 42% of cases.

Ultrasonography
Ultrasonography of colovesical fistulae has been described. In some instances, the fistula is easily identified, with no additional maneuvers needed.Ultrasonographic examination of suspected fistulous sites has been enhanced with the technique of manual compression of the lower abdomen, which reveals an echogenic "beak sign" connecting the peristaltic bowel lumen and the urinary bladder. As with cystography, ultrasonography is rarely used for primary imaging of fistulae.

Cystography
Cystography may demonstrate contrast outside the bladder but is less likely to demonstrate a fistula.
Radiographic signs have been described. The herald sign is a crescentic defect on the upper margin of the bladder that is visualized best in an oblique view. The herald sign represents a perivesical abscess. A "beehive on the bladder" sign is associated with the vesical end of the fistulous tract.

Treatment


Medical Therapy

Nonsurgical treatment of colovesical fistulae may be a viable option in patients who cannot tolerate general anesthesia or in selected patients who can be maintained on prolonged antibacterial therapy for symptomatic relief.

Surgical Therapy

Open surgery
Colovesical fistulae can almost always be treated with resection of the involved segment of colon and primary reanastomosis. Fistulae due to inflammation are generally managed with resection of the primarily affected diseased segment of intestine, with repair of the bladder only when large visible defects are present. The bladder usually heals uneventfully with temporary urethral catheter drainage. Suprapubic tube diversion is an option but is not necessary
Endoscopic treatment
A review of the literature reveals one reported case of a colovesical fistula treated with transurethral resection with no evidence of recurrence in more than 2 years of follow-up
Laparoscopic treatment
Several reports suggest that laparoscopic resection and reanastomosis of the offending bowel segment is possible as a minimally invasive treatment



 

0

URETEROCELE - A CASE REPORT



DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF URETEROCELE



IVP images



In the above case we can see that the right sided PCS appears duplicated. The ureter also appears duplicated in the upper portion.


The left sided kidney appears to be at a lower position and also shows clubbing of calyces with loss of papillary impressions and blunting of fornices which suggest gross hydronephrosis. Left sided ureter appears to be dilated throughout its course with kinking in the middle part. In the 3rd image the ureterocele is clearly seen within the bladder.


USG Correlation



On correlating with USG the above mentioned findings were confirmed.

The duplicated PCS can be appreciated in the RRight Kidney, Left kidney Hydroureteronephrosis is seen.

In the last image the typical appearance of the ureterocele can be appreciated.



CASE DISCUSSION


INTRODUCTION


Aureteroceleis a congenital abnormality found in theurinary bladder. In this condition calledureteroceles, thedistal ureterballoons at its opening into the bladder, forming a sac-like pouch. It is most often associated with a double collector system, where two ureters drain their respectivekidneyinstead of one



CLASSIFICATION



Intravesical

Confined within the bladder

Ectopic

Some part extends to the bladder neck or urethra

Stenotic

Intravesical ureterocele with a narrow opening

Sphincteric

Ectopic ureterocele with an orifice distal to the bladder neck

Sphincterostenotic

Orifice is both stenostic and distal to the bladder neck

Cecoureterocele

Ectopic ureterocele that extends into the urethra, but the orifice is in the bladder


SIGNS & SYMPTOMS


The signs and symptoms of ureteroceles in the latter two forms can easily be confused with other medical conditions.Symptomscan include:




COMPLICATIONS


Many other complications arise from ureteroceles. Redundant collection systems are usually smaller in diameter than single, and predispose the patient to impassablekidney stones. The effective "bladder within a bladder" compounds this problem by increasing the collision ofuric acid particles, the process by which uric acid stones are formed. Ureteroceles is also associated with poor kidney function. It can cause frequent blockage of the ureter leading to serious kidney damage. In other cases, a small, upper portion of the kidney is congenitally non-functional. Though often benign, this problem can necessitate the removal of non-functioning parts.


RADIOLOGIC EVALUATION & ITS LIMITATIONS


Radiologic evaluation of a ureterocele in an adult usually includes a kidney-bladder ultrasonography. Ultrasonography can be the initial study performed, and it can be used to detect prenatal ureteroceles. Ultrasonography noninvasively depicts anatomic changes in the kidney and bladder. Sonography should be performed with the bladder empty and with it filled to eliminate nonvisualization of ureteroceles due to either compression of the bladder or the ureterocele. Ultrasonography is the most sensitive test and often the only radiologic evaluation required for the diagnosis of ureteroceles.


Functional studies of the renal system include intravenous pyelography, CT scanning, and renal scanning. These contrast-enhanced studies help delineate the relevant renal anatomy, especially with regard to potential renal duplications. They are also useful in evaluating the differential renal function. Contrast-enhanced studies help identify ureteroceles within the bladder as a thin nonenhancing rim around contrast enhancement within the ureterocele. These functional studies often add supplemental information that is useful in the treatment of patients with ureteroceles, but they are typically not used as first-line imaging modalities for the diagnosis of suspected ureteroceles.



LIMITATIONS


Ultrasonography is the most sensitive test for the detection of ureteroceles. Ultrasonography may cause ureteroceles to be missed if the patient’s bladder is empty or fully distended, if the ureteroceles are small, or if the patient’s body habitus precludes proper examination. Ultrasonographic findings are relatively specific for ureteroceles because the other etiologies of a cyst within a cyst are relatively rare.


CT scans, intravenous pyelograms, and renal scans are less sensitive for ureteroceles, but they help to more clearly delineate the functional anatomy of the kidneys.


0

DIFFUSE IDIOPATHIC SKELETAL HYPEROSTOSIS (DISH)


The following is a case of Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis (DISH)


1


DISCUSSION :

  • General Considerations


    • More common in Caucasian males aged 50-75 years

    • Ossification of anterior longitudinal ligament with or without osteophytes is the primary pathology

    • DISH is an enthesopathy – there is reaction at the sites of tendinous insertions (entheses)

    • Laminated, flowing ossification

    • Should involve four contiguous vertebral bodies

    • Ossification is usually quite thick

    • Disc height is maintained in affected area

    • Does not have ankylosis of SI joints


      • Involvement of SI joints excludes DISH

    • Involves lower thoracic spine most often, but also cervical and lower lumbar spine most frequently


      • Left side of spine in thoracic area tends to not have ossification because of pulsations of aorta

  • Clinical Findings


    • Back stiffness or, less frequently, back pain


      • Stiffness is worse in the morning

    • Large osteophytes have also been reported to compress or obstruct a number of structures, including:


      • Bronchus

      • IVC

      • Esophagus

      • Increased incidence of calcification in surgical scars

      • Associated with


        • Hyperostosis frontalis interna

        • Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)

        • Ossification of the vertebral arch ligaments (OVAL)

  • Imaging Findings


    • Conventional radiography is usually study of choice

    • Flowing ossification along anterior aspect of vertebral bodies, but separated from them and the body

    • Should involve 4 levels

    • Ossification may thicken as disease becomes more chronic

    • “Whiskering” at the sites of tendinous insertion (entheses)


      • Pelvic involvement


        • Iliac crests

        • Ischial tuberosities

        • Iliolumbar ligaments

        • Lesser trochanter

      • Deltoid tuberosities of humerus

      • Olecranon spurs

    • Also may have ossification of the


      • Achilles tendon

      • Plantar aponeurosis

      • Triceps tendon

  • Differential Diagnosis


    • Ankylosing Spondylitis


      • Has involvement of SI joints

      • Syndesmophytes are thinner

    • Degenerative Disc Disease


      • Osteophytes form only at corners of vertebral bodies

      • Narrowing and desiccation of disc

    • Acromegaly


      • May produce osteophytes but they are not flowing

    • Fluorosis may produce osteophytes, whiskering and ligamentous ossification


      • But all bones are uniformly increased in density

1

A CASE OF ABSENT RADIUS

ABSENT RADIUS


The case repsents absence of radius alongwith absent first metacarpal and associated hypoplasia of the thumb.



1


2




DISCUSSION


Absent radius is a very rare medical condition in which the radius bone is not developed. This results in a typical position of the arm in which the wrist is plantarflexed and radially deviated.


The aetiology of radial club hand or radial dysplasia can be divided into:


1.sporadic cases, which are not inherited and are presumed to be due to de novo genetic mutations


2.syndromal cases; certain syndromes have a higher than expected association with radial dysplasia. Typically, organ systems are affected that develop at the same time as the upper limb :


§VACTERL or VATER syndrome


§Holt-Oram syndrome


§Edwards syndrome


§haematopoietic syndromes:


§Fanconi anemia


§Thrombocytopaenia with Absent Radius (TAR syndrome)


§craniofacial syndromes:


§Nager’s Syndrome


§Goldenhar’s syndrome


§Mobius syndrome


§cleft lip and palate


§Treacher-Collins syndrome


§skeletal syndromes and isolated skeletal associations:


§Klippel-Feil syndrome


§Sprengel deformity


§syndactyly


§scoliosis


§teratogens:


§radiations


§valproic acid


§thalidomide